swastimathur at gmail.com
Fri Sep 10 11:46:01 EDT 2010
in my view, difference of one acadamic year for a a scribe doesn't make
any difference provided that he / she belongs to same field for which
the candidate is from. of course, invigilation must be adiquately strict.
i strongly uphold the idea of not having any percentage limits for a
in many exams it is really simple to include computer based examination
in order to make rules more flexible, choice could be given to choose
between computer based test (CBT) or writing exams with scribe's
in my previous mail i forgot to mention about use of assistive
technology in cat examination. IIM authority gives facility of
magnifying software for low vission candidates.
if they can accomodate use of such technology for low vission
candidates, why can't they be asked to include screen readers as well?
i dont advocate suggestion of writing exams in brail as it involves many
perplexcities as pointed by many members. and also, it is a very tedium
task to write 80 90 pages in brail. but, obviously question papers can
be provided in brail to them who wish.
examining authority should in no case compele students to take writer
selected by them (authority). even if choice is given than also writer
would not be capable of fulfilling our expectations. writers have the
grand responsibility because our triumphant depends on their dexterity
of flawless writing and reading!
and thats all! these were my ideas. rest depends on you mam!!!
Kartik Sawhney wrote:
> According to me, there should be no rules regarding the qualifications
> of the writer whatsoever. The only golden rule should be strict
> invigilation and nothing else. A scribe one year lower also causes a
> No. of problems in technical and professional examinations wherein the
> technicalities of the question or the diagram etc. cannot be properly
> explained to the candidate by him/her as he/she has absolutely no
> On 9/9/10, Swasti Mathur <swastimathur at gmail.com> wrote:
>> in CBSE board rules for scribe are very linient. they dont compel neiter
>> to have writer from different field or subject nor have any upper or
>> lower percentage limits. a very simple rule which is to be followed is
>> that writer should be in a standard less than the candidate is appearing
>> for exam. candidates are permited to bring there own writers. a minor
>> loophole exist there that scribe should not be in blood relation with
>> candidate, implying sibling of vi candidate could not be writer of the
>> candidate. this in my view is not in any way problematic issue as there
>> are many people around us who fulfill above norms.
>> why not to have such flexible rules for all exams which are simple to be
>> abide with?
>> madam, lets not focus on making all exams computer based. i agree that
>> there are many technical issues involved in doing so. i know it will be
>> a troublesome step for many as technology has not maneuvered all around
>> india. i too hold antagonistic views for making all exams computer based
>> for vi candidates.
>> but, it is really easy to make use of screen readers in those exams
>> which are already computer based thereby reducing dependability on
>> scribe. what's the harm in doing so when our vi folks will become
>> Kanchan Pamnani wrote:
>>> Thanks friends I have been reading all the mails and should start
>>> compiling them next weekend so if there are more issues lets discuss them
>>> 1. There will be no compromise on Candidate's right to choose his scribe
>>> 2. At this stage we cannot insist that all exams be taken on line-sorry
>>> techies you need to be practical about this. We are talking about the
>>> country and all exams.
>>> Lets look at other issues and dont waste time on the above 2. Maybe we can
>>> think of different kinds of exams and their pecularities.
>>> Some years ago National Federation of the Blind had won a judgement which
>>> stated that the Blind can give the U P S E in braille. I needed to know
>>> if anyone has really done it in braille or has anyone even heard of a
>>> person who did it in braille. I need to know the experience.
>>> Voice your thoughts in the blog to discuss the Rights of persons with
>>> disability bill at:
>>> To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-request at accessindia.org.in
>>> with the subject unsubscribe.
>>> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes,
>>> please visit the list home page at
>> Voice your thoughts in the blog to discuss the Rights of persons with
>> disability bill at:
>> To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-request at accessindia.org.in with
>> the subject unsubscribe.
>> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please
>> visit the list home page at
> Voice your thoughts in the blog to discuss the Rights of persons with disability bill at:
> To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-request at accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe.
> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at
More information about the AccessIndia