[AI] Examinations

m.chandrashekar chandru342 at gmail.com
Sat Sep 4 14:57:05 EDT 2010

very nice, thank you for preparation and suggestions. 1 more suggestion I 
would like to add: in case of sudden absence of scribe, because of various 
reasons, let the invigilator become scribe, instead of simply sitting and 
observing, he or she can do this job.
with best regards
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Prashant Verma" <pr_verma at hotmail.com>
To: <accessindia at accessindia.org.in>
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 10:36 PM
Subject: Re: [AI] Examinations

> Dear Kanchan,
> Here is another draft that is on the same subject for the University level 
> exams.
>           Exam writing policy for students with disability-
> 1. The term examination stands for all examinations conducted by the 
> University, the Colleges and the Departments. It would include the final 
> exams, the college conducted half yearly (House exams), the semester 
> exams, the entrance tests and any other exams officially conducted by the 
> University, the colleges or the teaching faculty.
> 2. The facilities specified in the Document will include the following 
> categories of students:
> a. Students with visual disabilities
> b. Students with low vision
> c. Students with short term disability due to injury
> d. Students with orthopaedic disability
> e. Students with brain related ailments that demand support systems
> f. Students with any other type of disability accepted for this purpose by 
> the head of the institution, (to be approved by an officer designated by 
> the Examination Branch)
> 3. All students, in any of the categories mentioned above, may arrange for 
> their own writers, scribes. In case they are unable to do so, the 
> superintendent of the examination centre would provide a writer. The 
> candidate must, however, request for a writer at least 24 hours prior to 
> the commencement of the examination. A writers' bank must be created for 
> the purpose for a ready availability of writers whenever required. The 
> candidate must be given an opportunity to satisfy himself/ herself about 
> the writer's ability to take dictation from the candidate. There should 
> be, at least, a minimum comfort level between the candidate and the writer 
> and the invigilator.
> 4. One hour extra time over and above the prescribed time for a paper of 
> three hours duration and where the period is less than 3hrs., then extra 
> time allowed will be 1 / 3rd of the total duration of examination, be 
> given to write answer scripts, without obtaining prior approval of the 
> University.
> 5. There should be no clause regarding the academic qualification of the 
> scribe except a minimum level of education. As each candidate is required 
> to be assigned a separate invigilator and a separate room, it is the 
> responsibility of the invigilator to ensure a fair conduct of the 
> examination. (UPSC guidelines may be used) (Suggestion from Vikas Gupta: 
> students of humanities should preferably be provided with scribes of 
> humanities background and those of science and commerce and different 
> languages with scribes of respective backgrounds. He also feels that 
> levels of minimum education could be different for different courses).
> 6. It should not be mandatory for a candidate to mention his/ her 
> disability on the cover page of the answer script.
> 7. The writer must be paid at the end of each examination by the 
> superintendent of the concerned Centre whether the writer has been 
> arranged by the candidate or by the superintendent. Each Centre must 
> receive the required remuneration in advance from the University.
> 8. The remuneration to be paid to the writers must be enhanced from Rs. 
> 100/- to Rs. 300/- in accordance with revisions in the entire examination 
> system.
> 9. An extremely cumbersome requirement of a certificate from the 
> University Health Centre, in the case of persons with short term 
> disability, should be replaced with a simplified and convenient approach. 
> A certificate from an MBBS doctor and endorsed by the Head of the 
> Institution should be acceptable for a candidate to seek a writer for 
> writing an exam.
> 10. In case of a candidate, whose disability may not be a hindrance in 
> his/ her ability to write the exam himself/ herself, but could cause a 
> significant slow down in writing speed, the provision of extra time should 
> be allowed even if the service of a writer is not required. (Vikas feels 
> that a separate room should also be provided)
> 11. If the candidates so desire, they must be allowed to write their exam 
> through computers with the help of relevant and friendly software chosen 
> by them. Such students may write their exam at the college, if the college 
> is equipped with the software or at a centre approved by the Examination 
> Branch.
> 12. There should be clearly stated directions for invigilators who would 
> supervise over the candidates. The directives should be sent to the 
> superintendents with other printed instructions in advance.
> 13. Institutions used as centers for the entrance test/ exams etc. should 
> be the campus centers or the CIE run schools where monitoring may be 
> possible.
> 14. Examination Branch should designate an officer, who is fully 
> sensitized to assist, inform, conduct, supervise and attend to all work 
> regarding candidates in this category for easy and prompt disposal of all 
> enquiries and grievances. Such officer should work in consultation with 
> the Equal Opportunity Cell and the Coordinators of the Equal Opportunity 
> Cell in different colleges and departments in a reciprocal way of exchange 
> of information and use of expertise.
> The following are some new points not included in the Draft:
> 1. Blind students can write their answers on computers. The facility can 
> be extended to include laptops.
> 2. There are Declaration forms to be filled by both the scribe and the 
> candidate.
> 3. The scribe has to submit the following certificates:
>      Certified copy of Identification proof
>      Attested copies of Educational Qualifications
> 4. The candidate may be permitted to draw the diagrams etc. themselves, if 
> desired by them.
> 5. The Centre Superintendent shall make the sitting arrangements for the 
> dyslexic, blind, physically handicapped and spastic candidates on the 
> ground floor, as far as possible.
> 6. Alternate type questions may be provided in lieu of questions having 
> visual inputs for the blind candidates in English Communicative, social 
> Sciences, History, Geography and Economics etc.
> 7. Separate question papers in enlarged print for Maths and Science & 
> Technology may be provided for candidates having visual impairment.
> 8. The Centre Superintendent(s) are directed to send the answer books of 
> special category students in separate covers to the Examination Branch.
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Pamnani" <kanchanpamnani at hotmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 4:28 PM
> To: <accessindia at accessindia.org.in>
> Subject: [AI] Examinations
>> Most of you know that I have been working on the guidelines for 
>> examinations especially the issue of scribes for some time.
>> All of us have realised the need for standard guidelines in the country. 
>> After the maharashtra guidelines were issued many of you approached me 
>> and have been approaching me regularly for All India guidelines. 
>> Therefore it is time to act.
>> I have based my work on the:
>> 1. Guidelines in Maharashtra
>> 2. Minutes of meeting held in2008
>> 3. Judgement in Asif's case
>> 4. University of Bombay's circular on psychology
>> I need to know from each of you as to what you want in the new Rules. 
>> What you want to safe guard against,What you want the Examination 
>> authority to take care of and what will be the visually challenged's 
>> responsibility. Anything that I should take into account especially for 
>> any particular exam. Please ask for the moon we just might get it of 
>> course be practical. Think of all the variations and combinations and 
>> complications that someone somewhere may face.  Thats why I am still on 
>> this group.
>> I cannot take care of the idiot who denies the rules but I can ensure 
>> good rules on paper at least. So lets go for it. Please dont send me a 
>> list of what happened in the past I cant rectify it but I can see that it 
>> does not happen again. So requesting for some input.
>> The new rules will apply to :
>> 1. All recruiting exams
>> 2. All college and school exams
>> 3. All entrance exams
>> 4. any other exam that I have forgotten
>> Looking forward to your inputs
>> Thanks
>> Kanchan
>> Kanchan Pamnani
>> Advocate & Solicitor
>> 9, Suleman Chambers,
>> Battery Street, Colaba,
>> Mumbai - 400 039.
>> Voice your thoughts in the blog to discuss the Rights of persons with 
>> disability bill at:
>> http://www.accessindia.org.in/harish/blog.htm
>> To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-request at accessindia.org.in 
>> with the subject unsubscribe.
>> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, 
>> please visit the list home page at
>> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
> Prashant Ranjan Verma
> Consultant Training & Technical Support
> DAISY Consortium
> www.daisy.org
> Guest Faculty, Equal Opportunity Cell
> University of Delhi
> http://eoc.du.ac.in
> Voice your thoughts in the blog to discuss the Rights of persons with 
> disability bill at:
> http://www.accessindia.org.in/harish/blog.htm
> To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-request at accessindia.org.in 
> with the subject unsubscribe.
> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, 
> please visit the list home page at
>  http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in 

More information about the AccessIndia mailing list