[AI] What is true:
veerakumar8 at hotmail.com
Tue Sep 4 12:45:02 EDT 2007
Hai friends, I am not intend to ignore any one's contribution. Only I want
to disclose the facts. The NSDL formulate policy on 18 April 2007 itself. So
I want to express it would have been the cause of legal battle by Mr. T.
Sekar. It is unwise to state that we are going low. Is it not my right to
state the real facts. Please express your words without affecting others
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ketan Kothari" <muktaketan at gmail.com>
To: <accessindia at accessindia.org.in>
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 1:56 PM
Subject: Re: [AI] What is true:
>I think we are really going low. How does it matter who got the success.
> Also remember that as much as Mr.Sekhar deserves accolades, the
> contributions of Kanchan or Sam is no mean. Please let us not be so petty
> minded as to be praising one against the other. Incidentally, I do not
> think that Kanchan or Sam have claimed success solitarily.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "bv" <veerakumar8 at hotmail.com>
> To: <accessindia at accessindia.org.in>
> Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 10:44 PM
> Subject: [AI] What is true:
>> Hai friends, I am not able to contact you all for past 2 weeks, due to
>> family commitments. I learnt that NSDL. had revoked their circular
>> pertaining to VCs. In this regard I want to express real facts and my
>> views in the issue.
>> It was Mr. T. Sekar who challenged the very circular. He wrote to the
>> President of India, NSDL, SEBI and CCPD. He issued advocate notice to the
>> concerned parties in the month of June 2006. Thereafter he filed a Writ
>> Petition against the parties before the Honourable High Court of
>> Judicature at Madras in the month of January. The opposite parties had
>> appeared but only not filed their counter affidavit. Consequent upon the
>> legal battle the SEBI had issued a circular in the month of March 2007,
>> this regard. The NSDL had also issue directions vide NSDL Circular Nos.
>> NSDL/POLICY/2007/0016 and NSDL/POLICY/2007/0022 dated March 16, 2007 and
>> April 18, 2007.
>> I remember, The alleged Associations started sending representations only
>> in the month of June 2007.
>> I strongly opine that the person behind this success is Mr. Sekar, who
>> continuously and persistently represent the authorities over e-mails
>> advocate notice and filed the Writ. The representation of 21 associations
>> was only post operational measures.
>> Hence, I congratulate Mr. T. Sekar for this remarkable success. Stop not
>> your fight for right.
>> To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-request at accessindia.org.in
>> with the subject unsubscribe.
>> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes,
>> please visit the list home page at
> To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-request at accessindia.org.in
> with the subject unsubscribe.
> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes,
> please visit the list home page at
More information about the AccessIndia