[AI] What is true:
hpkotian at rbi.org.in
Tue Sep 4 01:09:20 EDT 2007
I do happen to know more about the case and I shall present it here.
At the outset, let me make it very clear that the comments are my own and
not as a moderator of this group.
Certainly, Sekar did a wonderful job in starting the fight. I too on my
part helped him build his case.
I must acknowledge the role of Kanchan who helped him immensely.
Again Kanchan along with Sam Tarapore , made a presentation to the CMD of
NSDL. He summarily agreed to withdraw in toto and requested for a supporting
letter from organisations working for the blind.
BV, if you read the circular, you would realise the circular was withdrawn
on the instance of the letters received from organisations for the blind and
not in the instance of the court, CCDP or letter written to the President
Rest what happend all of you know.
BV, I don't understand your motive behind making such comments. Every
persons effort has a role behind this success. No one had claimed as a one
persons effort. This is a team effort
Userping credit is not a good way to function and it will only demoralise
those who have worked for it.
We shall definately see more success in the future with joint and collective
efforts like this.
----- Original Message -----
From: "bv" <veerakumar8 at hotmail.com>
To: <accessindia at accessindia.org.in>
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 10:44 PM
Subject: [AI] What is true:
> Hai friends, I am not able to contact you all for past 2 weeks, due to
> family commitments. I learnt that NSDL. had revoked their circular
> pertaining to VCs. In this regard I want to express real facts and my
> views in the issue.
> It was Mr. T. Sekar who challenged the very circular. He wrote to the
> President of India, NSDL, SEBI and CCPD. He issued advocate notice to the
> concerned parties in the month of June 2006. Thereafter he filed a Writ
> Petition against the parties before the Honourable High Court of
> Judicature at Madras in the month of January. The opposite parties had
> appeared but only not filed their counter affidavit. Consequent upon the
> legal battle the SEBI had issued a circular in the month of March 2007, in
> this regard. The NSDL had also issue directions vide NSDL Circular Nos.
> NSDL/POLICY/2007/0016 and NSDL/POLICY/2007/0022 dated March 16, 2007 and
> April 18, 2007.
> I remember, The alleged Associations started sending representations only
> in the month of June 2007.
> I strongly opine that the person behind this success is Mr. Sekar, who
> continuously and persistently represent the authorities over e-mails
> advocate notice and filed the Writ. The representation of 21 associations
> was only post operational measures.
> Hence, I congratulate Mr. T. Sekar for this remarkable success. Stop not
> your fight for right.
> To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-request at accessindia.org.in
> with the subject unsubscribe.
> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes,
> please visit the list home page at
More information about the AccessIndia